In this paper, I build a model of firms’ growth with heterogeneous entrepreneurs where audits for taxes are conditioned either on sales or employees and where entrepreneurs negotiate a bribe in exchange of a tax rebate when audited by tax inspectors. I show that the impact differential between the two auditing strategies depends on the regulation environment of a country. The model is calibrated and validated using firm-level data from Uganda. The model replicates well the Ugandan size distribution of firms as well as other key statistics relevant for the counterfactual experiments. Simulations show that, in a situation where Uganda could fully eradicate tax evasion and used the recouped taxes to subsidise production, productivity per worker could increase by as much as 45%. I also show that there could be a 16% annual gain in productivity per worker solely by conditioning audits on sales rather than on employees in Uganda.

This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)