Few studies have compared the surgical outcomes of different surgical procedures currently used to treat refractory colonic slow-transit constipation (STC), despite the increase in the number of cases. This study aimed to analyse the long-term surgical outcomes of subtotal colectomy with antiperistaltic caecorectal anastomosis (SC-ACRA) vs total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA) for severe STC.


Between January 2005 and January 2015, we retrospectively collected clinical data of 55 patients who underwent TC-IRA (n =35) or SC-ACRA (n =20) for severe STC at our institution. The post-operative functional outcomes between the two groups were compared.


There were no significant differences in age (P =0.655), sex (P =0.234), period of constipation (P =0.105) and defecation frequency (P =0.698) between the TC-IRA and SC-ACRA groups. During a median follow-up period of 72 months (range, 12–120 months), there were no significant differences between the TC-IRA and SC-ACRA groups regarding the median number of bowel movements per day [3 (1/6–7) vs 3 (1/6–5), P =0.578], Cleveland Clinic Florida Constipation Score [2 (0–20) vs 2 (0–19), P =0.454], Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score [0 (0–5) vs 0 (0–2), P =0.333] and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index [122 (81–132) vs 120 (80–132), P =0.661]. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the incidence of post-operative complications between the two groups (37.1% vs 25.0%, P =0.285).


Our findings indicate that both TC-IRA and SC-ACRA are effective treatments for severe STC, with similar long-term outcomes.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.